top of page
The Legal Journal On Technology

MOBILE PLATFORMS to Block Data Broker from Collecting User Location Data

This article is written by our Director Priyadarshini Goenka, a first year student at NLUO



INTRODUCTION

As of 9th December 2020, the reputed Wall Street Journal initiated its report wherein it stated that the two companies Apple and Google would block all their respective data broker X-Mode Social Inc. (“X Mode”). The proposed procedure was ensured in terms of accumulating data from iPhone and Android users in particular. The above-renowned companies had served to be well-versed in their respective app developers in an attempt to eradicate Mode’s social tracking SDK from their list of apps. The elimination should take place within a short period else it would have resultant risk removal from all its platform’s app stores. The action exists in form of reports that state X-Mode has been dealing with its location data to particular defence independents and government entities.

Nevertheless, the suggestion brought out by WSJ reported that all the respective companies have been informed in form of notifications to Senator Ron Wyden about the ongoing action that was being discussed. Additionally, the Senator attended with a group of others who decided to solicit on different government free-lancers and agencies. Bringing out its specific nature, it was his position that pointed out the existence of sales related to a user’s location data introduced by Commercial Data Brokers keeping in view the various government entities that seemed unlawful without the possession of a valid warrant (the case that was eventually brought in the knowledge of SC, Carpenter v. the United States, 138 S.Ct. 2206 (2018) wherein it was held that the procurement of cell-site location info was to be viewed as a Fourth Amendment search).[1]

In addition, Senator Wyden decided to assert his analysis across all such practices that were viewed as limiting the sale of location data to the many government-held causes. However, the above seemed to move to a much broader data pursuing ecosystem. Being one of the Senators himself he decided to forward a letter to FTC Chairman Joseph J. Simons the previous year in which he displayed his urgency in front of the Company to let him examine whether or not the analytics firm Yodlee’s monetary data assembling progression had been on the risk of overstepping the above Act. Likewise, a request regarding a civil investigation demand got allotted by the FTC to Yodlee and consequently, a class action suit got implemented against the prevailing practices. [2]

Evaluating the entire situation and the desired conditions, it was fate asserted by X-Mode on the specific question as to whether the above would help aid the origination of the inference of the wide-ranging location-allocation process that operated on cell phones, or was it a remote occurrence connected to many profiling actions or data allocation with persuaded governmental agencies and intelligence entities.

Notwithstanding the many actions up taken by both the Companies to help bring in the questions that were left unanswered are listed as follows: -

v In the frontline there was a conflict in terms of how X-Mode's existence was viewed out of the place of the undertaken agreement with both the company’s evolving guidelines and privacy rules concerning the collection of data? The article formulated by WSJ states that Apple had well versed its inventors that X-Mode ‘has been secretly generating modernized user profiles that are founded on collected user data”, existing in abuse of its written terms of service. Moreover, in the time of data collection is identified as “surreptitious” and whether it is completed with the requisite notice and consent in accordance to the user’s requirements of its valid terms.

v The basic question of whether or not the platform would ratify bans in contradiction of data brokers or SDK social tracking inventors that are involved in parallel “surreptitious” gathering and reselling follows? Conferring to the account brought out by WSJ, X-Mode has appealed that the overall blocking was subjective on the condition that the additional marketing SDK’s have been gathering equivalent information and selling it to the money-making entities.

v In the third aspect, the two companies primarily Apple & Google to either constrict or administer many guidelines that recount to the convention of any detailed user’s location data? Henceforth, it is to be distinguished that Apple’s iOS14 strategies certified in the knowledge that was made relevant to its users in terms of occurrence of a third-party tracking code embedded in apps and how data can be retrieved, and not to give the prior position in assembling granular location data from its users (and the possibility that one could approve its users not to part exact geolocation data). In the forthcoming year, Apple had programmed to compress privacy that seeks app operators to safeguard opt-in agreement before apportionment of any user’s device ID correlated to ad tracking. Google the subject incorporated the set of restrictions on the front and circumstantial locational tracking.[3]

CONCLUSION

Putting aside the intricacy brought in by open questions, the newest advancement does convey attention to two main points. Firstly, the reality strikes that the location data is observed as being more susceptible and desirable that develops over time for both the respective entities specifically the dealers and other profitable entities. The specified process continues to involve sensitive scrutiny end to end with a rise in general cognizance in terms of sharing of required data that impacts its resellers or analytical partnerships. Hence, all the downstream receivers who are made to deal in collective data or reports are expected to crunch such data to help complete their due assiduousness and realize as to how such forms of data is being generated and whether or not such assortment that involves both contractual and mobile platform supplies are in a suitable place.[4]

[1] Apple and Google to Stop X-Mode From Collecting Location Data From Users’ Phones, Byron Tech, ( December 9 2020), THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, https://www.wsj.com/articles/apple-and-google-to-stop-x-mode-from-collecting-location-data-from-users-phones-11607549061. [2] Apple and Google to Stop X-Mode From Collecting Location Data From Users’ Phones, Byron Tech, ( December 9 2020), THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, https://www.wsj.com/articles/apple-and-google-to-stop-x-mode-from-collecting-location-data-from-users-phones-11607549061. [3] Mobile Platforms to Block Data Broker from Collecting User Location Data, Jeffrey Neuburger, ( December 11 2020), https://newmedialaw.proskauer.com/2020/12/11/mobile-platforms-to-block-data-broker-from-collecting-user-location-data/. [4] App Stores Have Kicked Out Some Location Data Brokers. Good. Now Kick Them All Out, Bennett Cyphers, ( March 10 2021), EFF, https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/03/apple-and-google-kicked-two-location-data-brokers-out-their-app-stores-good-now.

64 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Cross-Border Data Transfers in DPDP Act

By Uddhav Gupta (2nd Year MNLU , Nagpur) The DPDP Act  establishes a framework which safeguards digital personal data in India. It...

Comments


bottom of page